levicosta201 Posted July 10, 2014 Report Share Posted July 10, 2014 -> BUY HERE <- The module: Route Generator; aims to create random schedules for your virtual airline based phpvms. You no longer need to create one by one Schedules. Main features of this module: You can replace the "Schedules" from phpVMS module; Eliminates the error "no route passed.". You no longer have problems with incompatible javascript; Automatically calculates the distance between the airports; Automatically calculates the arrival time at the destination airport; Automatically calculates the flight time; ​Updates to this module will be available to the customer for free.Recalling that the module is limited to routes DCT. For I have not had time to create a database with multiple routes of various airports, however, this function will be available in future versions of the module.​ -> SAMPLE HERE <- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mseiwald Posted July 10, 2014 Report Share Posted July 10, 2014 Very nice module but i think you need to look again at a few functions. All flightlevels on the Sample page are very low and some flights are ~ 18h over 9500NM. I doubt that this is possible to achieve with a commercial aircraft. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
levicosta201 Posted July 10, 2014 Author Report Share Posted July 10, 2014 Very nice module but i think you need to look again at a few functions. All flightlevels on the Sample page are very low and some flights are ~ 18h over 9500NM. I doubt that this is possible to achieve with a commercial aircraft. Thank you for your feedback. As for level flight, my writing was a mistake, I've done the fix! Regarding flight times, I used an average speed to calculate the time of flight. For example: I used an average speed of 500 knots in cruise. This simply means that it will do 500 miles per hour, however, if I have a route 7317.88nm. The calculation would 7317.88/500 = + - 14.6 (The same than 14 hours and 40 minutes). I think my calculation is right. Even so I will look at my code again and see if there is something wrong! Thank you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strider Posted July 10, 2014 Report Share Posted July 10, 2014 955.231nm no way does that take 1hour to fly. I have flown an 823nm flight in a 747 at 505kts and it still took me 2 hours. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
levicosta201 Posted July 10, 2014 Author Report Share Posted July 10, 2014 955.231nm no way does that take 1hour to fly. I have flown an 823nm flight in a 747 at 505kts and it still took me 2 hours. I am now looking at my code, that there is some mistake! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Posted July 10, 2014 Report Share Posted July 10, 2014 500kts ≈ 575mph, but then you also have to factor altitude into the calculation as groundspeed > airspeed as you fly higher. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mseiwald Posted July 10, 2014 Report Share Posted July 10, 2014 500kts Groundspeed as average seems indeed pretty high. But what i actually meant was the distance of some of the flights 9500nm+ seems also too high. What aircrafttype is used on these flights? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
levicosta201 Posted July 11, 2014 Author Report Share Posted July 11, 2014 500kts ≈ 575mph, but then you also have to factor altitude into the calculation as groundspeed > airspeed as you fly higher. Thank's for the feedback. I'll take that into consideration 500kts Groundspeed as average seems indeed pretty high. But what i actually meant was the distance of some of the flights 9500nm+ seems also too high. What aircrafttype is used on these flights? B737 B747 B748 B767 B777 A330 E195 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strider Posted July 11, 2014 Report Share Posted July 11, 2014 Then your average flight speed is way off, as you wont be flying at 500kts or rarely in a 737 or a E195. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freshJet Posted July 11, 2014 Report Share Posted July 11, 2014 Why have you used jQuery Mobile? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
levicosta201 Posted July 11, 2014 Author Report Share Posted July 11, 2014 Then your average flight speed is way off, as you wont be flying at 500kts or rarely in a 737 or a E195. Yes, I looked at it too, and has reduced the average speed. I am now trying to improve the calculations of hours Why have you used jQuery Mobile? Why I wanted! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Posted July 11, 2014 Report Share Posted July 11, 2014 You'd be much better off going for a responsive framework instead of one designed for mobile, especially considering how your module will likely be used (99% desktops) 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
levicosta201 Posted July 11, 2014 Author Report Share Posted July 11, 2014 You'd be much better off going for a responsive framework instead of one designed for mobile, especially considering how your module will likely be used (99% desktops) I used the mobile for more a matter of taste. Nothing prevents you remove it! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.